All done.
Posts
Search Results
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 250
https://tantabus.ai/tags/rain+shine
g4 character tag
g4 character tag
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 21
Is
human on pony action supposed to be applied to anthro / humanized artwork, or is it strictly intended for feral ponies? The tags that imply it suggest that it should be restricted to feral, but the description is non-existent for it and several images across the site also have the anthro tag.Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 249
Rose Heart and Sophisticata should have character tags. Both should also imply “g4.”
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 248
Should be a character tag.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 247
gris swimsuit should imply one-piece swimsuit, tooTagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 246
Should be a character tag, Blue Belle and Minty both are.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 245
Should be a character tag.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 244
vagina peek and pussy peek should be one.Not sure in which direction though.
Derpi seems to prefer vagina, e621 and to some extend AI seems to prefer pussy.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 241
Should be a character tag.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 240
pillory should be merged into stocks like on derpibooruTagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 238
Background Pony #635A
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 237
I believe
rainbow bikini top should imply bikini top, rainbow bikini and rainbow braSimilar
… bottom, … and rainbow panties.Tagging Discussion » We're not furbooru » Post 2
Background Pony #0590
I wish others would’ve done the same thing as well, not just here; after all, I was recalling the memories of my time scrolling the namesake: to think they could get away with letting nipples out in the open…
Tagging Discussion » We're not furbooru » Post 1
Today, I’d recently came across an image that was tagged suggestive despite the nudity: though hardly new, the lack of professionalism alone was enough for me to take action at it were; nevertheless, it’s imperative that I shine some light on this.
I would highly suggest taking a look at the Tag Guidelines Some Nudity doesn’t immediately that it isn’t Suggestive.
Like for example:
Like for example:
“Breasts/buttcheeks/crotches any more than half uncovered on those implied to have bits to cover up”
So if an image shows a female with Cleavage, this is still considered Suggestive, not Questionable.
So if an image shows a female with Cleavage, this is still considered Suggestive, not Questionable.
Tagging Discussion » We're not furbooru » Topic Opener
Background Pony #0590
Okay, please hear me out on this one if you can: I want to start off by saying hello and thank you for giving me the opportunity to make this; in all honesty, I would have been better off starting this on a computer instead.
Anyway, I must do this because I’m not liking how some people can’t even tag properly as they should: although this is admittedly a common problem for many an imageboard, it should’ve been avoided no less; still, it’s clear that I must bring this issue to light.
Today, I’d recently came across an image that was tagged suggestive despite the nudity: though hardly new, the lack of professionalism alone was enough for me to take action at it were; nevertheless, it’s imperative that I shine some light on this.
Many users like, and unlike, myself have been well acquainted with the rules of this site: considering it was recently spun off from its predecessor, derpibooru, it was the least that could be done; of course, there have been cases where mistakes were made.
Either way, we the people have a responsibility to utilize tags to the utmost of our abilities: even though this is a free site, trouble ahead could be sprung up for anyone using a standard filter; besides, any anonymous user could stumble about.
As such, it’s vital that this spinoff must be handled with care all the very same no matter what: considering how often politicians have tried to censor the web over the decades, this wouldn’t be usual; ergo, the last thing we need is some Karen ranting on.
Likewise, all that should be is we use our good judgement in uploading any and all images as is: I don’t like stopping to anyone’s level when it comes to being goody Lovejoy, so to speak of; as such, I apologize for having to use such an intonation either way.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 235
how does
https://tantabus.ai/tags/horse+pussy+on+anthro
not imply
https://tantabus.ai/tags/anthro
It’s in the name, Tia burn it!
https://tantabus.ai/tags/horse+pussy+on+anthro
not imply
https://tantabus.ai/tags/anthro
It’s in the name, Tia burn it!
(oh, and hi! Nice site, thx)
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 234
Background Pony #635A
Houseplant and house plant should be aliased.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 233
@dergness
I agree with this.
I agree with this.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 232
“From below” should be aliased to “low angle”:
https://tantabus.ai/tags/from+below
https://tantabus.ai/tags/low+angle
I feel like there’s a difference.
For example >>62765 wouldn’t be a “from below” for me, but “low angle” still qualifies.
I.e. every “from below” is a “low angle”, but not the other way around. Maybe an implies instead?
For example >>62765 wouldn’t be a “from below” for me, but “low angle” still qualifies.
I.e. every “from below” is a “low angle”, but not the other way around. Maybe an implies instead?
Edit:
from below also seems used as a sex position occasionally, i.e. >>61084.Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 231
deviantart watermark and possibly others should imply watermark.Showing results 1 - 25 of 339 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |