Images that fail one of the criteria listed further down may to be deleted.
Practically all the examples of errors listed below could be be spotted and fixed before upload
These sort of artifacts commonly appear on the the corners of an image
Artifact on plant leave is clearly not a detail related to the plant.
Extra limbs, miss-sized torsos or limbs
Pinkieās left forelg vanishes into her apron or just missing entirely.
Big Macās arm would be unnaturally long, particularly as itās wouldnāt be straight.
Bad hands, too many fingers, things bending how they shouldnāt, weird bumpsā¦ Stylization is OK, fleshblobs are not.
AJās fingers arenāt great, but theyāre not obviously wrong or the close to being the focus of the image.
Weird eyes, extra nostrils, mouths that just arenāt right, eyelashes and eyebrows that are blobs or simply brokenā¦ Thereās a lot of small things that can go wrong here, but given how important the face is, they have a lot of impact; faces are important!
Iris / pupil shapes arenāt perfect, but not too bad either. Vague muzzle outline is again OK for cartoonish styles. (and AI really likes four freckesā¦)
The two characters on the left are noticeably low quality, and the Flutershy clone on the right is a mess.
That beach hair would snap immediately, and one of the supports o the back vanishes.
The outline isnāt bad or crunchy, and the weird eyes tears likely intentional.
For a fashion magazine cover, the focus would be the photo/model, so fake āponishā language is fine. and the big magazine title text is OK; however, the smaller text is mostly just chicken scratches.
The sign at the top isnāt too prominent or seems important
PLOT TWIST: Imagine you post real art in Tantabus, but it get deleted because its not real ai pictures
>>2017874tIm just joking around ;p
I still donāt know why Derpi didnāt automate their two image limit. Website should stop someone from submitting third AI image instead of having admins delete excessive images after the fact.
artist needed as placeholder), and placing the relevant tag after the fact. Quick way to juke it. Why someone would do this? Fuck knows. But I wouldnāt be surprised if someone did already.It could even queue the image to be auto-submitted later to stop people from circumventing the limit by omitting the AI tag (assuming that would even be a semi-common problem).
A ghost signature removal is a 5 minute job with the clone/patch tool in GIMP
*maximum* to find all filters with the word āmaximumā in their name. Similar approach works for searching comments or forum posts.Weāre hoping for people to be sensible about these things
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |