Posts

Is there a way to mass import tag descriptions/images/implications/aliases from Derpibooru? It doesn’t make sense having to manually recreate the extensive system of tag metadata. Especially since on Derpi this tag metadata will improve in the future (like aliasing the same tag in plural and singular) and it would be nice being able to keep importing these improvements.

If automatic import risks importing things that would be incorrect here, it would be best to have some sort of blocklist/patchlist for known intentional differences. (Like artist tags, I guess?)

This request is triggered by smiling at you, blaze (coat marking), and many more tags lacking metadata.

@Background Pony #1DED
Eh, I think these uploads can be assumed to be “ai generated” and retagged later if necessary.

On a related note, should there be a tag something like “process needed” (or “effort level needed”) to flag uploads that lack any of the “ai generated”/“ai assisted” etc. tags?

fallout equestria missing pink name and short name aka “foe”
fallout equestria: project horizons also missing pink name, should imply first one and probably should have “project horizons” as short name

Wallpaper for the fearless should imply wallpaper

Let:

official spoiler image implies spoiler image

spoilered image joke implies spoiler image

And, official spoiler image’s description could be:

Meanwhile, spoilered image joke’s description might could be (my writing might be poor, so might need changes):

@Zerowinger
Done.

Should be a character tag.

@tyto4tme4l
I did bing -> generator:bing image creator

If someone is using Bing, then I agree tagging generator:bing image creator is useful. But which generator MicroSoft is leveraging behind the scenes will be something that will change with time. So that implication will need to be maintained, and will not always be right for all Bing-generated images that are uploaded - especially during transitional periods.

In particular, I’m concerned about the timeliness and maintenance of having generator:bing image creator imply an individual version of Dall-E, assuming everyone accessing Bing is getting the same core technology.

And there are several ‘generators’ which, like Bing, are really just UIs that are leveraging something else behind the scenes.

Would that information be better expressed in the description of the top tag? For example, adding a description to generator:bing image creator that says that as of December 2024, Bing is using DALL-E 3 model PR16, rather than an implication pointing to DALL-E 3? Then when it changes in the future the new information could be added with the corresponding dates?

“bing” should be aliased to “generator:bing image creator”, which also should imply “generator:dall-e 3”.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/bing
https://tantabus.ai/tags/generator-colon-bing+image+creator
https://tantabus.ai/tags/generator-colon-dall-dash-e+3

@Bendy and Boney
Done.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/petunia+paleo
https://tantabus.ai/tags/coconut+cream
https://tantabus.ai/tags/toola+roola

More character tags.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/submachinegun
https://tantabus.ai/tags/rifle
https://tantabus.ai/tags/assault+rifle
https://tantabus.ai/tags/machine+gun
https://tantabus.ai/tags/pistol
https://tantabus.ai/tags/revolver
https://tantabus.ai/tags/sniper+rifle

All of the above should imply “gun” and by extension “weapon.”

@Zerowinger
Done.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/high+heels
should imply “shoes.”

@Bendy and Boney
Done.
@Thoryn
Done the siblings ones.

hair bow, hair ribbonand flower in hair should imply hair ornament (ornament = decorative)
hairband should imply hair accessory (practical, though may also be decorative)
Really though, the whole thing can become a bit of a clusterfuck with gray areas for defining things, because nothing can ever be simple.

Edit: sisters and brothers should imply siblings
PS: Even in case of adoption, it still counts as being siblings legally speaking, it’s not just the biological factor.
PPS: Would not be surprised if it does vary depending on jurisdiction, because again, why would anything be simple.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/kettle+corn
https://tantabus.ai/tags/nurse+sweetheart
Two more character tags I created.

@Thoryn
No, characters don’t imply accessories.

That’s just what the names were called on Derpi.

apple bloom should maybe imply hair bow?
Sure, she can be without it, but 99% (number pulled out of my ass) of the images, it’s there.

For Twilight Sparkle
twilight sparkle (alicorn) makes sense, name followed by race/kind is logical. (no link, couldn’t escape the () properly..)
unicorn twilight however uses it the complete opposite, and doesn’t even use the full name..

@Bendy and Boney
Done.

Could we maybe get some tags like resource in description, lora in description, model in description etc?
Those tags might be colored different than green?.., so I’m hesitant to adding them all willy nilly.

Edit:
There’s so many tags for messed up cutie mark, and I’m never really sure what tag to use when I see images without a tag for it at all, and the mark is all messed up.

alternate cutie mark and wrong cutie mark are the main ones.

ai doesn’t like cutie marks, altered cutie mark, cutie mark error, inaccurate cutie mark only have 1 image tagged as such.

If all these are supposed to be kept and used for cutie mark generation errors, it’d be helpful to know what tag to use when.
I’m assuming it will be inevitable that AI gets trained on AI.
Garbage in, garbage out. So it probably behooves us to tag cutie mark errors in a more uniform way.

Maybe have it as a requirement to tag e.g. one of the above or tag it with e.g. correct cutiemark? (or blank flank, for intended blank flanks)? Just like using a rating tag is required (I presume, haven’t uploaded anything yet)

https://tantabus.ai/tags/sweet+biscuit
I made another character LoRA today.

Huh… Three of those images were generated by me, but uploaded by someone else. Weird. LMAO.