“bing” should be aliased to “generator:bing image creator”, which also should imply “generator:dall-e 3”.
Posts
Search Results
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 67
@Bendy and Boney
Done.
Done.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 65
https://tantabus.ai/tags/submachinegun
https://tantabus.ai/tags/rifle
https://tantabus.ai/tags/assault+rifle
https://tantabus.ai/tags/machine+gun
https://tantabus.ai/tags/pistol
https://tantabus.ai/tags/revolver
https://tantabus.ai/tags/sniper+rifle
https://tantabus.ai/tags/rifle
https://tantabus.ai/tags/assault+rifle
https://tantabus.ai/tags/machine+gun
https://tantabus.ai/tags/pistol
https://tantabus.ai/tags/revolver
https://tantabus.ai/tags/sniper+rifle
All of the above should imply “gun” and by extension “weapon.”
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 63
https://tantabus.ai/tags/high+heels
should imply “shoes.”
should imply “shoes.”
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 61
hair bow, hair ribbonand flower in hair should imply hair ornament (ornament = decorative)
hairband should imply hair accessory (practical, though may also be decorative)
Really though, the whole thing can become a bit of a clusterfuck with gray areas for defining things, because nothing can ever be simple.
hairband should imply hair accessory (practical, though may also be decorative)
Really though, the whole thing can become a bit of a clusterfuck with gray areas for defining things, because nothing can ever be simple.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 60
https://tantabus.ai/tags/kettle+corn
https://tantabus.ai/tags/nurse+sweetheart
Two more character tags I created.
https://tantabus.ai/tags/nurse+sweetheart
Two more character tags I created.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 59
@Thoryn
No, characters don’t imply accessories.
No, characters don’t imply accessories.
That’s just what the names were called on Derpi.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 58
apple bloom should maybe imply hair bow?
Sure, she can be without it, but 99% (number pulled out of my ass) of the images, it’s there.
Sure, she can be without it, but 99% (number pulled out of my ass) of the images, it’s there.
For Twilight Sparkle
twilight sparkle (alicorn) makes sense, name followed by race/kind is logical. (no link, couldn’t escape the () properly..)
unicorn twilight however uses it the complete opposite, and doesn’t even use the full name..
twilight sparkle (alicorn) makes sense, name followed by race/kind is logical. (no link, couldn’t escape the () properly..)
unicorn twilight however uses it the complete opposite, and doesn’t even use the full name..
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 57
@Bendy and Boney
Done.
Done.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 5
Could we maybe get some tags like resource in description, lora in description, model in description etc?
Those tags might be colored different than green?.., so I’m hesitant to adding them all willy nilly.
Those tags might be colored different than green?.., so I’m hesitant to adding them all willy nilly.
Edit:
There’s so many tags for messed up cutie mark, and I’m never really sure what tag to use when I see images without a tag for it at all, and the mark is all messed up.
There’s so many tags for messed up cutie mark, and I’m never really sure what tag to use when I see images without a tag for it at all, and the mark is all messed up.
alternate cutie mark and wrong cutie mark are the main ones.
ai doesn’t like cutie marks, altered cutie mark, cutie mark error, inaccurate cutie mark only have 1 image tagged as such.
If all these are supposed to be kept and used for cutie mark generation errors, it’d be helpful to know what tag to use when.
I’m assuming it will be inevitable that AI gets trained on AI.
Garbage in, garbage out. So it probably behooves us to tag cutie mark errors in a more uniform way.
I’m assuming it will be inevitable that AI gets trained on AI.
Garbage in, garbage out. So it probably behooves us to tag cutie mark errors in a more uniform way.
Maybe have it as a requirement to tag e.g. one of the above or tag it with e.g. correct cutiemark? (or blank flank, for intended blank flanks)? Just like using a rating tag is required (I presume, haven’t uploaded anything yet)
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 56
https://tantabus.ai/tags/sweet+biscuit
I made another character LoRA today.
I made another character LoRA today.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 55
Huh… Three of those images were generated by me, but uploaded by someone else. Weird. LMAO.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 4
Honestly, it’s mostly just popularity and history at this point. Most ships have long-established ship names used across almost all fandom sites.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 54
@LightningBolt
In that case, I’ll give you the actual credit and give @Background Pony #BBCC a shiny star sticker.
In that case, I’ll give you the actual credit and give @Background Pony #BBCC a shiny star sticker.
By the way, there’s a tag discrepancy with Flutterbelle, as it’s missing the ship: prefix.
Edit: Flutterbelle shipping tag should also probably imply things like lesbian, Fluttershy, Sweetie Belle, female, shipping (as is the case with e.g. ship:Scootadash)
Edit: Flutterbelle shipping tag should also probably imply things like lesbian, Fluttershy, Sweetie Belle, female, shipping (as is the case with e.g. ship:Scootadash)
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 3
How is shipping tags decided upon? E.g. Fluttershy x Sweetie Belle, is tagged as “Flutterbelle”. Why not “Sweetieshy”?
(Flutterbelle sounds good, and I like it.. just wanted to know the reasoning)
(Flutterbelle sounds good, and I like it.. just wanted to know the reasoning)
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 52
@Background Pony #BBCC
That’s actually a good point! My previous post can be dismissed.
That’s actually a good point! My previous post can be dismissed.
Edit: Noticed the tag twicest is a thing, but it’s not implied by ship:twinight, ship:shiningsparkle, ship:velvet sparkle, ship:flurrylight
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 51
https://tantabus.ai/tags/high+winds
Another character tag I’ve created here.
Another character tag I’ve created here.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 50
Background Pony #BBCC
@Thoryn
Do you think they don’t get humanized or species swapped too much for it to be worth the trouble?
Do you think they don’t get humanized or species swapped too much for it to be worth the trouble?
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 49
@Thoryn
No, because species and race swaps are common and there are canon non-alicorn versions of many of those, see Equestria Girls.
No, because species and race swaps are common and there are canon non-alicorn versions of many of those, see Equestria Girls.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 48
https://tantabus.ai/tags/alicorn should be implied for tags like Princess Cadance, Princess Flurry Heart, Princess Luna, Princess Celestia, Nightmare Moon, Daybreaker, OC:Fausticorn
Tagging Discussion » "Generator:" tags should not imply "ai generated" » Post 2
I agree with the OP. When first seeing the “generator” tag, I thought it would contain the name of the person, who generated the art. I think a better name would be any of
tool:zoinksnoob, ai:zoinksnoob, but I guess that ship has already sailedShowing results 301 - 325 of 434 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |