@Background Pony #AA3A
I don’t know. If I where to rank them from ease of results I would say that first comes NovelAI, I think it’s the paid version and not the leaked one they’re using, then goes Cookie’s new model (A12), and last comes purplesmart.ai (PONY_V2) because since they combined Furry into it they just made it worse (because it doesn’t specialize in anything, just make a separate Furry model and keep this one Pony+Anthro)
I’d love to see someone make a video comparing the proficiency of purplesmart.ai desktop version compared to other ai programs like NovelAI. Do people using NovelAI get perfect results on their first prompt? Or do they need to make edits with inpaint or photoshop?
@Background Pony #AA3A
Id argue purplesmart.ai doesnt make very convincing artwork. Often the eyes or hooves are distorted, cutie marks are garbled messes. In the cases it’s harder to decern, you can tell the AI likes to fall back on the classical painter aesthetic because it’s probably what it’s largely fed on data-wise. In this case her hoof looks like a strange nub that also doesn’t appear long enough. She also doesn’t appear anthro, yet has a human chest.
@Background Pony #AA3A
But those at least cover the front so they work as actually clothing while mainly being about sex appeal.
This is just looks like someone cut a whole in the back so it’s now gunna drag everywhere.
Only way this would make sense is if someone had torn a hole though the back.
I don’t know. If I where to rank them from ease of results I would say that first comes NovelAI, I think it’s the paid version and not the leaked one they’re using, then goes Cookie’s new model (A12), and last comes purplesmart.ai (PONY_V2) because since they combined Furry into it they just made it worse (because it doesn’t specialize in anything, just make a separate Furry model and keep this one Pony+Anthro)
Don’t see why you have to make it personal :/
Are you just bad at prompting? Too impatient to inpaint? No skills to edit in photoshop?
Id argue purplesmart.ai doesnt make very convincing artwork. Often the eyes or hooves are distorted, cutie marks are garbled messes. In the cases it’s harder to decern, you can tell the AI likes to fall back on the classical painter aesthetic because it’s probably what it’s largely fed on data-wise. In this case her hoof looks like a strange nub that also doesn’t appear long enough. She also doesn’t appear anthro, yet has a human chest.
But those at least cover the front so they work as actually clothing while mainly being about sex appeal.
This is just looks like someone cut a whole in the back so it’s now gunna drag everywhere.
Only way this would make sense is if someone had torn a hole though the back.
Neither do those “virgin killer” sweaters, really. It’s like she’s wearing chaps made out of a dress.
Don’t use craiyon, use stable diffusion
I made this on my computer from the free download program that purplesmart.ai provided.